|
Establishing Rights for Corporate Whistleblowers
|
The NWC’s Attorney experts on Corporate whistleblowing have lectured throughout the United States, including special presentations on the SOX before the American Bar Association, the U.S. Department of Labor National OSHA Training Conference and the National Employment Lawyers Association.
If you are interested in attending a training seminar or having a NWC Attorney as a guest lecturer, contact Estelle Kohn at 202-342-1903 or ek@whistleblowers.org. |
|
Since its formation, the National Whistleblower Center has assisted corporate whistleblowers. In the wake of the corporate scandals that rocked Wall Street in early 2000, the Center successfully urged Congress to enact protections for corporate whistleblowers. These protections, enacted into law as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, are among the strongest and most effective federal whistleblower laws. In addition to working with Congress in order to ensure that the intent behind the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is followed by the current administration, the Center continues to provide assistance to corporate employees who expose wrongdoing. SOX Resource Page.
Labor Department Issues Final Rules for SOX Whistleblower Rights-
Washington, D.C., August 25, 2004: Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued final rules governing Corporate Whistleblower Procedures under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (SOX). In implementing the final regulations, the DOL rejected a request by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce that would have seriously undermined the protections afforded employees under this Corporate Whistleblower Law.
The Chamber of Commerce unsuccessfully attempted to undermine the preliminary reinstatement provisions contained in the SOX. Under the SOX, a whistleblower can obtain a Preliminary Reinstatement Order (PRO) within sixty days of filing his or her complaint. The final regulations provide OSHA with the authority to order immediate reinstatement on the basis of its investigation. The preliminary reinstatement remains effective while the claim is awaiting a trial on the merits. Consequently, an employee can be back at work, earning a full salary, during the years of delay which often arises in civil litigation.
The Chamber proposed severely limiting OSHA’s ability to order the PROs of employees. The Chamber requested that OSHA’s authority to order such relief after an investigation be eliminated, and that an employee be forced to wait until after the trial on-the-merits to obtain his or her job back. The Chamber also attempted to limit PROs to cases in which such an order would cause “minimal disruption” to a company and that the evidence of wrongdoing was “overwhelming.” The DOL rejected these proposals, explaining its position as follows:
[T]he Chamber commented that the regulatory exceptions to preliminary reinstatement should be broadened. They further commented that preliminary reinstatement should become effective only after the administrative adjudication has been completed . . . . The statute, however, explicitly provides that a preliminary order of reinstatement shall be issued upon the conclusion of an investigation that determines that there is reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred. Moreover, the purpose of interim relief, to provide a meritorious complainant with a speedy remedy and avoid a chill on whistleblowing activity, would be frustrated if reinstatement did not become effective until after the administrative adjudication.
“The Chamber’s proposals were clearly counter to Congress’ intent. The Department of Labor correctly rejected this blatant attempt to misuse the rulemaking process and undermine a major federal whistleblower law,” said Stephen M. Kohn, Chairman of the National Whistleblower Center (NWC).
According to Kohn, the SOX provision permitting OSHA to order the immediate reinstatement of a wrongfully discharged employee is an “essential and critical protection” afforded corporate whistleblowers: “The immediate reinstatement provision ensures that whistleblowers will not have to wait years for their case be be heard in court. This provision will make every publicly traded corporation think twice before they attempt to fire an employee such as Sharron Watkins or Cynthia Cooper. The Chamber’s attempt to gut this aspect of the law was disappointing and very troublesome. We sincerely hope that the Chamber will work cooperatively with whistleblowers in order to promote confidence and honesty in publicly traded corporations.”
Online - SOX Final Rule, 29 CFR Part 1980
|