Follow the NWC on Twitter!Follow the NWC on Facebook!
“Deep Throat’s” Contacts with Press Were Protected Under Whistleblower Law

Washington, D.C., June 1, 2005. The following statement was issued by Stephen M. Kohn, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the National Whistleblowers Center in regards to the controversy surrounding the public disclosure of the Watergate-whistleblower’s identity.

This whistleblower, commonly known as “Deep Throat,” was credited with providing the public with information directly related to illegal conduct within the White House:

The current controversy surrounding Mr. W. Mark Felt’s confidential disclosures to the news media regarding illegal conduct in the Nixon White House is misplaced. The law on whistleblowing was intended to protect government employees who make disclosures to the news media. The very first United States Supreme Court case upholding the right of government employees to ”blow the whistle” on misconduct (Pickering v. Board of Education) concerned an employee who made his disclosures to the news media. That decision, issued over 35 years ago, has been repeatedly followed by nearly every court in the United States.

The reasoning behind protecting employees who “blow the whistle” to the news media is well established. On the one hand, whistleblowers who report their concerns only to their bosses are often ignored or retaliated against. On the other hand, reporting allegations to the press is often the best way to force the government to do its job. Public exposure is absolutely critical in initiating objective investigations into misconduct, which have led to significant reforms and have protected the public interest.

A government employee swears his or her allegiance to the Constitution of the United States, not to the White House or any government bureaucrat. The American public has the “right to know” about illegal conduct by high ranking officials. In the case of Mr. Felt, his disclosure options were very limited. He had good cause to believe that his chain of command would not properly address the allegations. For example, the Attorney General and Director of the FBI were both appointed by President Nixon and, at the time of the initial disclosures, were loyal to the President. In fact, Mr. Felt’s third line supervisor, President Nixon, was directly implicated in the misconduct.

Tags: Press Releases