LABOR DAY REPORT:
THE
NATIONAL STATUS OF WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION
ON LABOR DAY, 2002
National Whistleblower Center
3238 P Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20007
202-342-1902
www.whistleblowers.org
Whistleblowers
still remain a target of discriminatory practices. A survey of whistleblowers
who contacted the National Whistleblower Center in 2002 demonstrates that
retaliation against whistleblowers remains a major problem in the United
States. The survey results are as follows:
*59.5%
of whistleblowers were male, and 40.5% were female
*49.5
% alleged they were terminated after they blew the whistle
*51%
blew the whistle on fraud or criminal practices, while 10% exposed environmental
problems, 11.5% complained of discriminatory practices, 8.5% raised concerns
in the medical profession and 19% raised health and safety related concerns.
The
survey was based on a random review of 200 cases which were reported to
the NWC in the year 2002.
In
addition to the survey of employee-complaints, a survey of current federal
legal protections finds that employees who expose wrongdoing in many areas
of public concern lack protection. Among the areas in which no whistleblower
protections exist are: food safety, patient abuse and Homeland Security.
Based
on these findings, the National Whistleblower Center continues to support
the passage of a comprehensive national Whistleblower Protection Act modeled
on the federal protections currently provided to victims of discrimination
based on race, sex and age. In the alternative, the NWC will continue to
support piece-meal legislation designed to address specific gaps in employee
protections.
STATISTICAL BREAKDOWN OF WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINTS
DEMONSTRATES THAT RETALIATION REMAINS COMMON
A review
of 200 whistleblower complaints reported to the NWC in 2002 reveal the
following findings:
Gender Breakdown
Male: 119
Female: 81

Employer
Government Employee: 97
Private
Sector: 107

On-the-Job Harassment
or discipline: 101

Environmental 20
Workplace Discrimination 23
Medical
Related 17

Whistleblowers
who contacted the NWC had worked in every State and performed numerous
jobs, including: accountants, airline pilots, chief operating officers,
computer programers, corporate vice presidents, corrections officers, doctors,
engineers, farm workers, flight attendants, mailman, maintenance employees
managers, mechanics, nurses, policemen, psychologists, repairman, sales,
social workers, supervisors and teachers.
Whistleblowers
who contacted the NWC said they learned of the NWC and its Attorney Referral
Service from a wide variety of sources, including: the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the Internet, U.S. Attorneys offices, the
NAACP, Congressional offices, unions, government agencies, friends and
relatives, newspapers, TV shows and the NWC’s web page and other pubic
interest groups.
SURVEY OF LEGAL PROTECTIONS DEMONSTRATES THAT MANY
LOOPHOLES EXIST IN FEDERAL PROTECTION FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS
In
July, 2002 Congress passed whistleblower protections for Wall Street employees
who disclose financial misconduct in publicly traded companies. This historic
legislation helped fill one of the major loopholes in federal whistleblower
protection laws. But other major loopholes continue to exist. A survey
of these protections demonstrates that a need remains for Congress to pass
a general Whistleblower Protection Act modeled on the federal law which
prohibited discrimination on the basis of race, age and sex.
Fifteen
Major Federal Whistleblower Protection Laws
Law’s
CoverageYear Passed
Race/Sex Discriminatory Practices1964
Mine Safety1969
Occupational Safety1970
Water Pollution1972
Safe Drinking Water1974
Solid Waste Pollution1976
Air Pollution1977
Nuclear Power1978
Superfund Clean-ups1980
Truck Safety1982
Federal Contractor Fraud1986
Bank Fraud1989
Most Federal Employees 1989
Airline Safety2000
Wall
Street Fraud2002
Twenty
Major Areas Still Lacking Federal Whistleblower Protection
Forensic LaboratoriesNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Election Fraud / Campaign Finance Abuse No Federal Whistleblower Protection
Biotechnology / DNA SafetyNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Food SafetyNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Obstruction of JusticeNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Homeland SecurityNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Endangered SpeciesNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Tobacco HazardsNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Pharmaceuticals and Prescription Drug AbuseNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Anti-Trust/Unfair Trade PracticesNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Patient Abuse and Medical FraudNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Misuse of PesticidesNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Consumer FraudNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
FBI/Other federal security agencies No Federal Whistleblower Protection
Auto SafetyNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Computer and telecommunications fraudNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Criminal Justice abusesNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
General Public Health and SafetyNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Ocean DumpingNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
Witness
IntimidationNo Federal Whistleblower Protection
In
addition to the lack of protection, whistleblowers also face double-taxation
of remedies due to a loophole in the federal tax code. Additionally, in
many industries whistleblowers are unable to obtain a judicial remedy for
retaliation due to unfair pre-employment agreements in which employees
are required to sign-away whistleblower remedies years before they witness
wrongdoing. Finally, many of the federal statutes listed above which due
protect whistleblowers contain provisions which render the laws very weak.
For example, six of the laws referenced above has a statute of limitations
which force employees to learn of their rights and file a complaint within
30 days of being fired or disciplined. The Administrative Conference of
the United States had recommended that the minimum time for filing such
a complaint should be 180 days.
CONCLUSION
The
importance of protecting whistleblowers is becoming ever-more apparent.
Employees knew of the problems which existed at Enron and WorldCom, but
were afraid to contact federal authorities due to the lack of any protections.
Billions of dollars in retirement and personal savings were lost. In law
enforcement, FBI employees knew of weaknesses in the federal anti-terrorism
program, but were afraid to speak out. These recent examples mirror other
whistleblower cases, such as the Karen Silkwood allegations which forced
federal authorities to strengthen nuclear safety, the Ernie Fitzgerald
allegations which forced the Department of Defense to clamp down on contractor
fraud and the Frederic Whitehurst allegations, which exposed weaknesses
in crime labs at the FBI and throughout the United States.
Strong citizen support is vitally needed in order for whistleblowers to finally obtain realistic legal protections against unfair retaliation.